 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Good fortune came again when a passing
acquaintance led me to Claire Roberts,
of Sydney’s Powerhouse Museum.
Roberts, having herself done pathfinding
work on Hedda Morrison, told me that
Alastair Morrison, Hedda’s husband,
was living in Canberra, Australia.
In late 1995 he replied to my initial
letter. ‘The whereabouts of
the Hong Kong photographs’,
Alastair wrote, ‘is something
of a mystery; and any light that you
might be able to throw on them would
be most welcome.’ A year later,
in April 1996, Alastair Morrison and
I met for the first time. Hanging
in his home were much-loved framings
of some of his wife’s most memorable
images. From that first encounter
a mutual understanding evolved: to
find and publish Hedda’s Hong
Kong photographs.
In the late 1980s Hedda Morrison –
aware of the historic value of her
lifetime’s
work – had chosen the Harvard-Yenching
Library at Harvard University, and
the Cornell University Library, as
the permanent repositories of her
photographs. Shortly after her death
in December 1991, Alastair fulfilled
her wishes: Morrison’s China
photographs went to Harvard, her Southeast
Asian collection to Cornell.
Hedda Morrison had intended to catalogue
her life’s work, but the size
of the task, and the sudden onset
of her final illness, made this impossible.
Thus, when her collection reached
Harvard in 1992, almost the only records
were Morrison’s own filing system.
As with many photographers, her filing
rested largely on a long-developed
visual recall of individual images.
This, allied with the fact that none
of Morrison’s summary documents
mentioned any Hong Kong photographs,
made initial research into the collection
– seeking the 1946
– 47 Hong Kong images –
doubly difficult.
Hedda Morrison’s Hong Kong photographs
have historical and social significance
for three reasons besides their content,
range and quality. First, she was
an ‘original’, with no
imposed agenda from any journal, employer
or strong personal socio-political
views – thus adding to the objective
evidence that her images offer. Second,
despite the troubles that Hong Kong
saw from the 1930s to the early 1950s,
the place was not photographed in
detail during that period; and nor
does one find the concerted work of
a single photographer of Hedda Morrison’s
stature. Third, in 1946 – 47
Hong Kong was on the brink of profound
change. Within little over a decade
economic and social transformations
would sweep away much of the traditional
Hong Kong life, precisely that which
Morrison’s ethnographically-inclined
photographs depict so well.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|